Pastor, You Can’t Always Get What You Want

The relationship between a pastor and a team of elders can be complex, often resulting in the pastor not getting everything s/he wants. Some key insights into this dynamic include:

Role of the Pastor and Elders

  • Shared Leadership: Whether or not the pastor chairs the elder board s/he does not (and should not) have unilateral control over decisions. Instead, s/he presents ideas and plans seeking to build consensus, while valuing the input and advice of the other elders. This collaborative approach means that while the pastor’s vision is important, it is not always the final word.[1] [2]
  • Decision-Making Process: Many churches operate on a consensus model where decisions require agreement among elders (but hopefully not unanimity). If consensus cannot be reached, a majority vote may be used, leading to outcomes that do not align with the pastor’s preferences.[3] [4] This structure emphasizes the importance of mutual respect and accountability within church leadership.
  • Unified Outcomes: Whether or not there is disagreement regarding any given outcome, the elders must speak with one voice or not at all[5] when they exit the boardroom.

Challenges in Relationships

  • Conflict is Inevitable: It is good to view all conflict as an opportunity to grow closer to God and each other. Disagreements among elders are common due to differing opinions and expectations. Such conflicts can arise from simple misunderstandings, priorities, timing related to the next steps, or a lack of clarity regarding roles and responsibilities. This makes it unrealistic to expect a completely harmonious relationship over time.[6] [7]
  • Feedback and Communication: Healthy relationships require open communication. Elders must provide honest feedback to the pastor about various aspects of church life. This transparency helps in addressing issues before they escalate but can also lead to situations where the pastor feels challenged or unsupported.[8] [9] It is important to ask the question, “Are we relationally unified?” at the conclusion of every elder’s meeting.

Conclusion

In summary, while a pastor often prepares the agenda for an elder meeting that includes vision-casting ideas, S/he does not always get their way due to the collaborative nature of church governance, potential conflicts among elders, and the necessity for clear communication and feedback. This structure is designed to ensure accountability and shared responsibility within church leadership, ultimately aiming for a unified direction that honors both the pastor’s vision and the collective wisdom of the elders. See Acts 15 for an example of collaborative leadership in action, especially v. 28: “For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us…”


[1] peninsulabible.org/senior-pastor-role-in-relation-to-elders/?t

[2] efcaeast.com/the-pastors-most-strategic-relationship/?t

[3] peninsulabible.org/senior-pastor-role-in-relation-to-elders/?t

[4] http://www.desiringgod.org/messages/before-division-comes?t

[5] img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/48a6315f-0689-4fbc-acd4-0cb2967d462a/downloads/Elder%20Expectations%20-%20The%20Journey.pdf?ver=1698169850593

[6] baptist21.com/blog-posts/2018/conflict-among-fellow-elders/?t

[7] blogs.efca.org/posts/what-pastors-want-from-their-elder-board?t

[8] blogs.efca.org/posts/what-pastors-want-from-their-elder-board?t

[9] efcaeast.com/the-pastors-most-strategic-relationship/?t

Leadership Is an Art

In the mid-80’s I had the chance to meet and spend time with Max De Pree while I was a student at Fuller Seminary. His book, Leadership Is an Art, had been assigned in a class and he was also a board member at Fuller. I became a huge fan and have spent my ministry career seeking to develop the art of leadership in the churches I have served. There are a multitude of books detailing the science of leadership but very few extolling the art of leadership.

Leadership Is an Art

Max De Pree was the Chairman of Herman Miller, Inc., during an especially creative period for the furniture design company. He was also a Fuller Theological Seminary board member and the inspiration and namesake for Fuller’s Max De Pree Center for Leadership. De Pree authored several highly regarded leadership books including Leadership Is an Art, Leadership Jazz: The Essential Elements of a Great Leader, Leading Without Power, and Called to Serve: Creating and Nurturing the Effective Volunteer Board.

Leadership Is an Art presents a unique perspective on leadership that emphasizes two key concepts:

1. Leadership as stewardship: De Pree views leadership not as a position of power, but as a responsibility to serve others and nurture the organization’s values and culture.

2. Defining reality and expressing gratitude: “The first responsibility of a leader is to define reality. The last is to say thank you. In between the two, the leader must become a servant and a debtor. That sums up the progress of an artful leader” (pg. 11).

 The book outlines De Pree’s view of a leader’s core duties. Enabling others to reach their potential: According to De Pree, empowering followers to achieve their personal and institutional potential is a key aspect of leadership.

Focus on relationships and values: De Pree stresses the importance of building relationships, initiating ideas, and creating a lasting value system within an organization.

Participative management: The book advocates for inclusive decision-making processes and recognizing the diverse gifts and talents of team members.

Measuring leadership through followers: De Pree suggests that the true measure of leadership is seen in the growth, learning, and achievements of the followers.

Leadership as an ongoing learning process: De Pree views leadership as an art to be learned over time through practice and experience, rather than simply by reading books.

Overall, Leadership is An Art expresses a values-based approach to leadership that emphasizes serving others, fostering developmental growth, and building a strong organizational culture based on shared values and effective relationships wherein team members enjoy the status of being co-creators.

Criticism

Over the years I have received my share of criticism. Much of it has been deserved. When it happens, deserved or not, I will recall a quote I read about 45 years ago from J. Oswald Sanders’ classic leadership primer, Spiritual Leadership. Here’s what he wrote…

“No leader is exempt from criticism, and one’s humility will nowhere be seen more clearly than in the manner in which one accepts and reacts to it. Samuel Brengle, who was noted for his sense of genuine holiness, had been subjected to caustic criticism. Instead of replying in kind or resorting to self-justification, he replied: ‘From my heart, I thank you for your rebuke. I think I deserved it. Will you, my comrade, remember me in prayer?’ On another occasion, a biting, censorious attack was made on his spiritual life. His answer was: ‘I thank you for your criticism of my life. It set me to self-examination and heart-searching and prayer, which always leads me into a deeper sense of my utter dependence on Jesus for holiness of heart, and into sweeter fellowship with Him’” (p. 120).

While I have not often been known for my “genuine holiness” (maybe Linda has), I have nevertheless come back to these words time and time again and sought to reflect and respond with a heart to learn and to grow.

What About My Anger?

Matthew 5:21-26

Anger is an old foe of mine. I have struggled with anger for most of my life. It’s been mostly self-directed – with a few exceptions along the way. As I think I’ve mentioned in a previous sermon. I am a reactor on a life-long journey to become a responder. While I am much more aware of my triggers these days, I can still be reactive at times.

One way I have come to describe my anger over the years is that it can feel like a pinball of anger ricocheting around my soul. I’d like to think that at least sometimes it’s righteous anger but mostly it’s me wanting what I want when I want it.

When I was much younger, I got into a fight and went into a blind rage, and put another young man into the hospital. It terrified me because I had no idea where the rage came from. The end result is it likely moved me toward trusting Jesus because I realized I couldn’t trust myself. And it even affected my early days of marriage. When Linda and I disagreed I shut down because I was afraid of what might happen.

All that to say, I’m a fellow traveler—not someone who has it all together.

So, let’s see what Jesus has to say about our anger. Matthew 5:21-26 is one of the premier relational passages in the whole Bible.

It is the first of six commands in Matthew 5 that theologians call The Six Antitheses (Matthew 5:21-48). Sometimes these are called the Six Intensifiers, because that’s what Jesus is doing. All six of these commands begin with the words, “You have heard it said, but I say to you…”

This phrase was actually quite common for Rabbis to use. What they were usually trying to say is, “You thought it meant only this, but actually it means this…”[1] What Jesus is doing with these six commands is pointing to a way of life that is much much deeper and more expansive than just the words of the command itself. Jesus is not changing the meaning; He’s intensifying the meaning.

Jesus wants His hearers to search out the wisdom underneath the command. It’s actually a lot like reading the book of Proverbs (Wisdom Literature). We can read a proverb and think to ourselves, “There’s a lot more here than there appears to be at first glance.”

What Jesus is saying with these six commands, is that God’s wisdom can be found in every Law of the OT and Jesus is showing us how to dig for and find that wisdom. Jesus agrees with these six commands from the OT and goes on to apply them in very practical ways and reveal the deeper intentions of the OT Law.

In these six commands, Jesus is not so much reinterpreting the OT Law, but He is correcting the long-term misunderstandings of the OT Law.[2] Last week it was pointed out that the followers of Jesus are to be a city set on a hill (5:14) and in these verses that follow Jesus is teaching about the kind of human community and relationships that we ought to be intent on developing. The basic problem of the Pharisees and other religious teachers—and I would say, the basic problem of the human condition, lies in the contradiction between our outward professions, our acts of piety, and the condition of our hearts. Jesus addresses this contradiction later on in Mathew 23:23 where He says, “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cumin and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness.” The scribes and Pharisees had become experts in the minutia of the OT Law instead of delving into the matters of the heart.[3] It would be incorrect to say that Jesus is replacing the OT Law rather, He is showing His disciples that, the Law, rightly understood, goes much further than what the scribes and the Pharisees had taught them.[4]

So, with all that said, let’s consider Matthew 5:21-26…

“You have heard that the ancients were told, ‘YOU SHALL NOT MURDER,’ and ‘Whoever commits murder shall be answerable to the court.’ 22 But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be answerable to the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be answerable to the supreme court; and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell. 23 Therefore, if you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there you remember that your brother has something against you 24 leave your offering there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering. 25 Come to good terms with your accuser quickly, while you are with him on the way to court, so that your accuser will not hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the officer, and you will not be thrown into prison. 26 Truly I say to you, you will not come out of there until you have paid up the last [cent].” 

And here’s the big idea: To maintain right[eous] relationships, we receive God’s grace to battle our anger and contempt at the heart level.

With the notion that Jesus came to actually turn the world right side up, I think this passage addresses three ways this happens as we learn how to process our anger (and contempt) biblically.

  1. Right-Side-Up Reckoning (Vs. 21-22)
  2. Right-Side-Up Reconciliation (Vs. 23-24)
  3. Right-Side-Up Recompense (Vs. 25-26)
  4. Application: Remember the Way of Righteousness

Let’s consider them one at a time…

  1. Right-Side-Up Reckoning (Vs 21-22)

“You have heard that the ancients were told, ‘YOU SHALL NOT MURDER,’ and ‘Whoever commits murder shall be answerable to the court.’ 22 But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be answerable to the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be answerable to the supreme court; and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell.” 

So, the first thing we see here is that Jesus is equating anger with murder (righteous vs. unrighteous anger – Jesus in the Temple / Eph 4:26). Martyn Lloyd-Jones said in his commentary on the Sermon on the Mount that we are only to be angry at sin. We also see here that both murder and anger are answerable to the local court.

What we have here is unrighteous anger followed by two insults. The Greek word for “you good-for-nothing” is raca, which literally means ‘empty-headed.’ Dallas Willard points out that raca may have “originated from the sound one makes to collect spittle from the throat in order to spit.” And the Greek word for the phrase, “you fool” is the same word (mōros) we get our English word moron.

What’s most interesting here is that while the descriptions of the behaviors decrease in intensity – from murder to anger to empty-headed, to moron, YET notice the consequences increase from being accountable to what amounts to the local court, then to the Supreme Court, and then if we call someone a moron, we could end up in the fiery hell!

Can you imagine what the congregation listening to Jesus must have been thinking? (And I hope you’re a little bit freaked out as well.) Remember, Jesus just said, in v. 20, that the righteousness of His followers MUST EXCEED the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees.

Tim Mackey from the BibleProject said of this verse, that Jesus “is scrambling our sense of values” to make the point that He is just as concerned with the thoughts and intents of the heart (Heb 4:12) as He is with any outward action or activity. That’s heavy.

And there’s even a deeper meaning to grab a hold of here… Insults, anger, and murder are all declarations of contempt that devalue a person who was made in the image of God. The late Dallas Willard, writes that “contempt is to think or speak of someone in such a degrading way that they are dehumanized. It spits on the deep need to belong and is inherently poisonous. It stabs the soul to its core and deflates its powers of life. Contempt can hurt so badly and destroy so deeply that murder would almost be a mercy.”

In these verses, Jesus is teaching us to see in ourselves all the ways our anger and insults devalue and express contempt for people as we, or when we, sit in judgment of another’s worth. The scribes and Pharisees simply did not understand the deeper purpose of the Law.

  1. Right-Side-Up Reconciliation (Vs. 23-24)

“Therefore, if you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there you remember that your brother has something against you 24 leave your offering there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering.”

Biblical scholars would say the context here is that you have just insulted your brother and are now presenting your offering to the Lord. The one who initiates the reconciliation here is the one who has wronged the other person.[5] What Jesus is saying is that God only welcomes offerings from those who are acting justly (Gen 4:4–7; Pr 15:8; Isa 1:11–17; Jer 6:20; Am 5:21–24).[6] This is a distinct reference to Cain and Able.

  1. Right-Side-Up Recompense (Vs. 25-26)

“Come to good terms with your accuser quickly, while you are with him on the way to court, so that your accuser will not hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the officer, and you will not be thrown into prison. 26 Truly I say to you, you will not come out of there until you have paid up the last [cent].”

Jesus is saying that we need to seek reconciliation quickly. And that failure to reconcile will have disastrous consequences on a human level, but even more so if we are not reconciled to God.[7] Jesus is also addressing the problem of conflict in the larger society—in this case legal conflict, which (as we know) has only proliferated in our current cultural context. Followers of Jesus are to consistently pursue, and seek to assist with, heart level reconciliation in all areas of life.[8]

Application: Remember the Way of Righteousness

To make our way to practical application we must first go back to Matthew 5:20: “For I say to you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.”

I hope that today’s passage helps you to see that righteousness, from the perspective of Jesus, has much more to do with the intent of the heart than any outward compliance or activity. Matthew 5:20 is the thesis statement of the whole sermon. The main point of the SOTM is that Jesus is explaining that our righteousness comes most unexpectedly—it’s the right-side-up way.

To partake of the righteousness that Jesus is challenging us to live by, we must go back and put into practice the first three Beatitudes, remembering there is an emptying and then a filling in our spiritual formation (or sanctification) process.

beatitudes-1

Martyn Lloyd-Jones in his commentary states, “Keep showing up at Mat 5:3.”

Blessed are the poor in spirit… To enter into God’s kingdom, we are invited to admit that we have come to the end of ourselves and need God’s help and care.

Blessed are those who mourn… As we are honest about our own sinful tendencies there will be a transforming grief, or repentance, that surfaces – not only for our own lives, but also for the injustice, greed, and suffering that grips our world.

Blessed are the meek…Grieving over sin and suffering places us in a humble learning posture (remember, disciple means learner).

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness…Spiritual hunger and thirst is the desire to be empty of those things that don’t reflect God and initiate a deep deep longing for wholeness in our lives. And it’s out of that longing that God supplies His empowering grace to do IN us and THROUGH what we have not been able to do on our own.

Exceeding the righteousness of the scribes and the Pharisees, then, is a matter of seeking to worship, honor, serve, and responsively obey God from a fundamentally changed heart. This is a heart that reaches beyond the legalistic boundaries of the law to allow the Holy Spirit to have complete and total access to our hearts that will fill us afresh with mercy, purity, and peace.

[1] NIV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible Notes.

[2] ESV Global Study Bible Notes.

[3] Gospel Transformation Study Bible Notes.

[4] Pillar New Testament Commentary.

[5] ESV Global Study Bible Notes.

[6] NIV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible Notes.

[7] ESV Global Study Bible Notes.

[8] Reformation Study Bible Notes.